The first article presents their knowledge that Karadzic is a monster through presenting "facts" that Karadzic is behind countless atrocities in Serbia, yet they present little justification for this. There is suggestions that their knowledge is justified through Knowledge by Authority; that they have aquired this knowledge from reliable sources.
The second article on the other hand doesn't even mention Karadzic, though he visited camps in Karadzic's area of "influence," and using logic you could deduce that Karadzic is a monster due to the condition of the camps; justified by Knowledge by Deduction. The whole article, on the other hand, is justified through Knowledge by Empiricism on his part and Authority on our part.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Liam:
Please elaborate on your blog. You need to reflect a bit more on the articles provided. Please provide specific quotes to justify your claims. Each post must be 20 min. I want to see even more examples of WoK.
Question: 3/5
Wok/Aok: 4/5
Personal:2/5
Punctuality:5/5
Total: 14/20
Post a Comment