1. After learning about how the Bosnian War began and the role of Karadzic and Milosovic, was it fair for the Independent to use the word "Monster"?
I believe it was fair for the Independent to use the word "Monster." There really was no question that Karadzic was behind these crimes, and there are a great many eyewitnesses to justify that his forces committed these atrocites, and thereby it goes along that he knew about these occurances which is easily justified by reason.
2. How do you think this phrase would be justified, according to Plato? Use specific examples from the reading and the documentary, The Death of Yugoslavia, to justify your claims.
The phrase itself is hard to justify the phrase itself because monster can mean many things, so it depends on the meaning you're trying for. If you mean someone who's doen horrible things then Plato would be able to justify it through Reason, Authority and Empiricism for some.
3. When the term Monster is used, what do you think it means?
Someone who's done, or order horrible things to be done. Someone who's actions are terrible enough to be percieved by humanity as a whole as wrong and inhuman.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Liam:
The entire question isn't covered. Also, where are the quotes from the reading? Always consider: Why should i believe you?
Question: 0/5
Wok/Aok: 3/5
Personal:2/5
Punctuality:5/5
Total: 10/20
Post a Comment